United States v. Antoine Echols, Sr.

252 F. App'x 110
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 2007
Docket07-2856
StatusUnpublished

This text of 252 F. App'x 110 (United States v. Antoine Echols, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Antoine Echols, Sr., 252 F. App'x 110 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Echols has filed an untimely notice of appeal (NOA) from the district court’s 1 June 25, 2007 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) motion for early termination of his supervised release. Echols filed his NOA within forty days of entry of the June 25 order, however, and thus we remand to the district court to determine whether Echols’s failure to file a timely NOA was due to excusable neglect, and if so, whether the time for filing his NOA should be extended. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Petty, 82 F.3d 809, 810 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam).

1

. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joseph Anthony Petty
82 F.3d 809 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F. App'x 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antoine-echols-sr-ca8-2007.