United States v. Anthony Thomas Torcasio
This text of 993 F.2d 368 (United States v. Anthony Thomas Torcasio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the previous opinion in this ease, United States v. Torcasio, 959 F.2d 503 (4th Cir.1992), we affirmed the judgment of the district court convicting Torcasio of aiding and abetting a state official in the commission of extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and for one count of perjury for lying to a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. We remanded, however, for resentencing in view of our decision in United States v. Dunnigan, 944 F.2d 178 (4th Cir.1991). The district court had adjusted Torcasio’s sentence upward for the testimonial denial of guilt under Guideline § 3C1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guideline, and following Dunnigan we held this unconstitutional.
The United States Supreme Court has now reversed our Dunnigan decision, United States v. Dunnigan, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1111, 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993). In view of this, we amend our first opinion in Torcasio, 959 F.2d 503 (4th Cir.1992), by affirming the district court’s judgment in its entirety, including the district court’s sentencing actions.
The previously issued mandate shall be recalled and the mandate reissued immediately effecting the holding of the within opinion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 F.2d 368, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11117, 1993 WL 153759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-thomas-torcasio-ca4-1993.