United States v. Anthony Provenzano

353 F.2d 1011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Anthony Provenzano. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 F.2d 678
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 25, 1966·No. 15317_1·Published

Opinion

353 F.2d 1011

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Anthony PROVENZANO, Appellant.

No. 15317.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 15, 1965.
Decided Dec. 22, 1965, Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Robert Shaw, Judge.

Arthur Karger, New York City (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Perth Amboy, N.J., Warren W. Wilentz, Perth Amboy, N.J., Alfred Donati, Jr., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for appellant.

Richard A. Levin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order Denying Defendants' Motion for a New Trial will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Shaw in his Opinion reported at 240 F.Supp. 393 (D.N.J.1965).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anthony Provenzano, 353 F.2d 1011 (3d Cir. 1966).

353 F.2d 1011 (United States v. Anthony Provenzano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Provenzano
240 F. Supp. 393 (D. New Jersey, 1965)