United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion

475 F.2d 770

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1973

Docket73-1171

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 475 F.2d 770 (United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion, 475 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Victor Sherman, counsel for appellant, is assessed a penalty of Two Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(e), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The sum is to be paid into the registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California within 14 days from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Victor Sherman, counsel for appellant, is assessed a penalty of Two Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(e), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The sum is to be paid into the registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California within 14 days from the date of this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F.2d 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-nicholas-carrion-ca9-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack