United States v. Anthony J. Alfonso and Andrew Alfonso
This text of 527 F.2d 1343 (United States v. Anthony J. Alfonso and Andrew Alfonso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anthony J. ALFONSO and Andrew Alfonso, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 74--3776
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 5, 1976.
George J. Dowd, Chalmette, La., for defendants-appellants.
Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., Mary Williams Cazalas, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Thomas E. Rickhoff, Sp. Atty., Dept. of Justice, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JONES, WISDOM and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case arose from the same facts as did United States v. Ladd, 5th Cir. 1976, 527 F.2d 1341, decided this day. In the Ladd case this Court upheld the district court's refusal to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a wiretap order entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. No different disposition is required here.
The judgments and sentences of the district court are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 F.2d 1343, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-j-alfonso-and-andrew-alfonso-ca5-1976.