United States v. Anthony

24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

While, in a strictly chemical sense, the terms “ethyl alcohol” and “spirits of wine” are generic terms, and the term “distilled spirits,” as defined by [Rev. St. ü. S.] § 3248, when used in that sense, would be generic, and not necessarily confined to the product of distillation, still, the term “distilled spirits” has also an ordinary and literal meaning, which implies distillation, and, when it is used in the latter sense, it is confined to the product of distillation. It is so used in section 3296 and in this indictment. Consequently, the indictment shows the subject-matter to be subject to tax, under section 3254. and is good.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037 (circtsdny 1877).

24 F. Cas. 833 (United States v. Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. United States
250 F. Supp. 995 (D. South Carolina, 1966)