United States v. Anthony
This text of 24 F. Cas. 833 (United States v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While, in a strictly chemical sense, the terms “ethyl alcohol” and “spirits of wine” are generic terms, and the term “distilled spirits,” as defined by [Rev. St. ü. S.] § 3248, when used in that sense, would be generic, and not necessarily confined to the product of distillation, still, the term “distilled spirits” has also an ordinary and literal meaning, which implies distillation, and, when it is used in the latter sense, it is confined to the product of distillation. It is so used in section 3296 and in this indictment. Consequently, the indictment shows the subject-matter to be subject to tax, under section 3254. and is good.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-circtsdny-1877.