United States v. Anthony

24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F. Cas. 833 (United States v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037 (circtsdny 1877).

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

While, in a strictly chemical sense, the terms “ethyl alcohol” and “spirits of wine” are generic terms, and the term “distilled spirits,” as defined by [Rev. St. ü. S.] § 3248, when used in that sense, would be generic, and not necessarily confined to the product of distillation, still, the term “distilled spirits” has also an ordinary and literal meaning, which implies distillation, and, when it is used in the latter sense, it is confined to the product of distillation. It is so used in section 3296 and in this indictment. Consequently, the indictment shows the subject-matter to be subject to tax, under section 3254. and is good.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. United States
250 F. Supp. 995 (D. South Carolina, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 833, 14 Blatchf. 92, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-circtsdny-1877.