United States v. Anthony
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-10910 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
LEWIS HENRY ANTHONY,
Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-371-1-G --------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Lewis Henry Anthony, the Federal Public
Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Anthony has filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and Anthony’s APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Anthony (United States v. Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.