United States v. Anthony Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2019
Docket18-1426
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Anthony Brown (United States v. Anthony Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Anthony Brown, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1426 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Anthony Jovon Brown, also known as Anthony Brown

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________

No. 18-1427 ___________________________

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeals from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________

Submitted: January 14, 2019 Filed: February 22, 2019 [Published] ____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Brown appeals his sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment for bank robbery. He challenges the district court’s1 application of the crime of violence enhancement under the sentencing guidelines, contending that his Illinois attempted robbery conviction does not qualify as a career offender predicate under the guidelines’s force clause. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1). “We review de novo the district court’s determination that a conviction constitutes a crime of violence.” United States v. Williams, 899 F.3d 659, 662 (8th Cir. 2018).

We recently held that Illinois robbery is a “violent felony” under the force clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(b). Dembry v. United States, No. 17-2849, 2019 WL 436580, at *2-3 (8th Cir. Feb. 5, 2019). “The relevant definition of a violent felony under the ACCA and the definition of a crime of violence under the guidelines are so similar that we generally consider cases interpreting them interchangeably.” United States v. Sykes, 914 F.3d 615, 620 (8th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Applying this logic, we hold that Illinois robbery is a crime of violence under the guidelines. And because Illinois robbery is a crime of violence, so too is Illinois attempted robbery. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1) n.1 (noting that a “crime of violence” includes attempts to commit such an offense). This conclusion is consistent with Seventh Circuit decisions, which have “repeatedly held that Illinois robbery is a crime of violence

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2- under the ‘force’ clause of § 4B1.2(a)(1).” United States v. Davis, 712 F. App’x 578, 579 (7th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 2695 (2018).

For these reasons, we affirm Brown’s sentence. ______________________________

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ramone Williams
899 F.3d 659 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Airrington Sykes
914 F.3d 615 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Davis
712 F. App'x 578 (Seventh Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Anthony Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-brown-ca8-2019.