United States v. Anthony Alardin

392 F. App'x 501
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 2010
Docket10-1856
StatusUnpublished

This text of 392 F. App'x 501 (United States v. Anthony Alardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Anthony Alardin, 392 F. App'x 501 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Alardin appeals from the order of the District Court 1 denying his motion for a certifícate setting aside his 1983 criminal conviction under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA), 18 U.S.C. § 5021 (1982) (repealed 1984). We grant Alardin’s motion to file a supplemental brief. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments and reviewing the record, we conclude that the District Court properly denied Alardin’s motion because he did not receive an early unconditional discharge from his original term of probation or from his subsequent two-year probation-revocation sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 5021(a) (requiring the issuance of a certificate setting aside a FYCA conviction upon the Parole Commission’s unconditional discharge of the committed youth offender before the expiration “of the maximum sentence imposed upon him” (emphasis added)); id. § 5021(b) (requiring the issuance of a certificate setting aside a FYCA conviction when a youth offender has been placed on probation and the court grants him an unconditional discharge from probation before “the expiration of the maximum period of probation theretofore fixed by the court ” (emphasis added)); Tuten v. United States, 460 U.S. 660, 666, 103 S.Ct. 1412, 75 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983) (noting that the set-aside provision in § 5021(b) applies only to youth offenders discharged before their original proba *502 tionary terms have expired). Accordingly, we affirm the District Court.

1

. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuten v. United States
460 U.S. 660 (Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 F. App'x 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anthony-alardin-ca8-2010.