United States v. Antelope
429 U.S. 892, 97 S. Ct. 251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Antelope. Read the opinion of the Court — 430 U.S. 641 →
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 424 U. S. 907.] Motions of respondents for' leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motions for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that John W. Walker, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondents Leonard Francis Davison and William Andrew Davison, and that [893]*893Allen. V. Bowles, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondent Antelope in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Antelope, 429 U.S. 892, 97 S. Ct. 251 (1976).
429 U.S. 892 (United States v. Antelope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.