United States v. Antarious Caldwell

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-10325 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10325 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTARIOUS CALDWELL, a.k.a. Fat, a.k.a. Phat,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 24-10325 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10325

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00145-TWT-JKL-39 ____________________

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and WILSON and LUCK, Cir- cuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adam Hames, appointed counsel for Antarious Caldwell in this resentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further rep- resentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Additionally, Caldwell has moved pro se for appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo- tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Caldwell’s sentences are AFFIRMED. Further, Caldwell’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED as moot.