United States v. Anita Yates
This text of 438 F.3d 1307 (United States v. Anita Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
404 F.3d 1291
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anita YATES, Anton F. Pusztai, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 02-13654.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 30, 2005.
Richard F. Matthews, Jr., Ronald W. Wise, The Law Office of Ronald W. Wise, Timothy C. Halstrom (Court-Appointed), Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.
Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Linda I. Marks, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Consumer Lit., Washington, DC, Tommie Brown Hardwick, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. 00-00109-CR-N-2); Anthony A. Alaimo, Judge.
(Opinion Nov. 24, 2004, 391 F.3d 1182, 11th Cir.2004)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Notes:
Senior United States Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.3d 1307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anita-yates-ca11-2005.