United States v. Anita Yates

438 F.3d 1307
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 30, 2005·No. 02-13654·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

404 F.3d 1291

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anita YATES, Anton F. Pusztai, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-13654.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 30, 2005.

Richard F. Matthews, Jr., Ronald W. Wise, The Law Office of Ronald W. Wise, Timothy C. Halstrom (Court-Appointed), Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Linda I. Marks, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Consumer Lit., Washington, DC, Tommie Brown Hardwick, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. 00-00109-CR-N-2); Anthony A. Alaimo, Judge.

(Opinion Nov. 24, 2004, 391 F.3d 1182, 11th Cir.2004)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges*.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Notes:

*

Senior United States Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anita Yates, 438 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2005).

438 F.3d 1307 (United States v. Anita Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Penny Morris
284 F. App'x 762 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)