United States v. Anita Yates

438 F.3d 1307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 2005
Docket02-13654
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 F.3d 1307 (United States v. Anita Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Anita Yates, 438 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

404 F.3d 1291

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anita YATES, Anton F. Pusztai, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-13654.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 30, 2005.

Richard F. Matthews, Jr., Ronald W. Wise, The Law Office of Ronald W. Wise, Timothy C. Halstrom (Court-Appointed), Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Linda I. Marks, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Consumer Lit., Washington, DC, Tommie Brown Hardwick, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. 00-00109-CR-N-2); Anthony A. Alaimo, Judge.

(Opinion Nov. 24, 2004, 391 F.3d 1182, 11th Cir.2004)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges*.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Notes:

*

Senior United States Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Penny Morris
284 F. App'x 762 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 F.3d 1307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anita-yates-ca11-2005.