United States v. Angelo Meli

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Angelo Meli

265 F.2d 222, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 1959

Docket13608_1

StatusPublished

This text of 265 F.2d 222 (United States v. Angelo Meli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Angelo Meli, 265 F.2d 222, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228 (6th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In an action to revoke the citizenship of appellee on the ground that he had fraudulently concealed the fact that he had filed two prior petitions for naturalization, and had also concealed a criminal record, the district court held that the government had failed to prove the alleged fraud or illegality by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of Judge Levin, of the district court, reported in United States v. Meli, D.C.E.D.Mich., 158 F.Supp 217. We are of the view that the judgment should be, and is, hereby affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the district judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an action to revoke the citizenship of appellee on the ground that he had fraudulently concealed the fact that he had filed two prior petitions for naturalization, and had also concealed a criminal record, the district court held that the government had failed to prove the alleged fraud or illegality by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of Judge Levin, of the district court, reported in United States v. Meli, D.C.E.D.Mich., 158 F.Supp 217. We are of the view that the judgment should be, and is, hereby affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the district judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 F.2d 222, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-angelo-meli-ca6-1959.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack