United States v. Angelo Luis

422 F.2d 1322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Angelo Luis. Read the opinion of the Court — 418 F.2d 439
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1970·No. 27740·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Here petitioner-appellant by objection prior to publication of the Court’s opinion and after notice from the Clerk under Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court objected to submission without oral argument. He again attacks this by petition for rehearing. We find, however, that there is no merit to his contention. United States v. Ambers, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F.2d 942, cert. denied, 1970, 396 U.S. 1039, 90 S.Ct. 686, 24 L.Ed.2d 683.

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Angelo Luis, 422 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1970).

422 F.2d 1322 (United States v. Angelo Luis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Willie J. Ambers
416 F.2d 942 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)