United States v. Angel Lara-Garcia

170 F. App'x 12
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2006
Docket05-2098
StatusUnpublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 12 (United States v. Angel Lara-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Angel Lara-Garcia, 170 F. App'x 12 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angel Lara-Garcia appeals the 185-month prison sentence the district court * imposed after Lara-Garcia pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy and forfeiture charges. Lara-Garcia argues the court committed reversible error when it found he did not meet the requirements for safety-valve relief set forth in U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Lara-Garcia failed honestly to provide the government with all the information and evidence he had concerning his involvement in the charged drug conspiracy. See U.S.S.G § 5C1.2(a)(5); United States v. O’Dell, 204 F.3d 829, 838 (8th Cir.2000) (affirming denial of safety-valve relief based on testimony and district court’s own credibility assessments). Accordingly, we affirm.

*

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gary O'Dell
204 F.3d 829 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-angel-lara-garcia-ca8-2006.