United States v. Angel Hernandez-Cifuentes

670 F. App'x 233
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2016
Docket16-40550 Summary Calendar
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 F. App'x 233 (United States v. Angel Hernandez-Cifuentes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Angel Hernandez-Cifuentes, 670 F. App'x 233 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Angel Hernandez-Cifuentes appeals the sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that the district court erred in assessing a 16-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) based on the determination that he was previously deported following *234 a conviction for a crime of violence (COY). Hernandez-Cifuentes contends that his prior Georgia conviction for aggravated assault is not a GOV because the Georgia offense is broader than the generic definition of aggravated assault as it does not require an intent to injure but instead requires only the intent to commit an act that places another in reasonable apprehension of injury. Hernandez-Cifuentes cites to United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez, 788 F.3d 193 (5th Cir. 2015), in support of his contentions.

The arguments raised by Hernandez-Cifuentes are identical to those raised by the defendant and rejected by this court in United States v. Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d 577, 582-85 (5th Cir. 2016), petition for cert, filed (Sept. 1, 2016) (No. 16-5853). Relying on prior unpublished decisions and the Model Penal Code, the Torres-Jaime court held that the Georgia offense was the equivalent of the generic offense of aggravated assault under the common sense' approach. Id. Thus, the district court did not err in determining that Hernandez-Cifuentes’s prior Georgia conviction for aggravated assault was a COV and in applying the 16-level § 2L1.2(b) enhancement.

Accordingly, Hernandez-Cifuentes’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Juan Cervantes-Sandoval
671 F. App'x 315 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-angel-hernandez-cifuentes-ca5-2016.