United States v. Angel Alvarado
This text of United States v. Angel Alvarado (United States v. Angel Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2020
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED October 12, 2020 No. 20-50083 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Angel Alvarez Alvarado,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-52-1
Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Angel Alvarez Alvarado pleaded guilty, without the benefit of a plea agreement, to possession of a firearm after felony conviction and was sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment. He challenges the district court’s application of a sentencing enhancement, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B),
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2020
No. 20-50083
based on his possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. Here, the unrebutted presentence report stated that in addition to the firearm, Alvarado possessed 51 grams of cocaine, individually packaged for distribution, and that he admitted to selling cocaine for monetary compensation. The district court did not clearly err by applying the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement based on its plausible determination that Alvarado was engaged in drug trafficking. See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14(B)(ii)); United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146-48 (5th Cir. 2013). Alvarado’s unsupported speculation that he might have intended to consume rather than distribute all of the cocaine he possessed is unpersuasive and insufficient to demonstrate clear error. See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 146. AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Angel Alvarado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-angel-alvarado-ca5-2020.