United States v. Angel Alvarado

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 2020
Docket20-50083
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Angel Alvarado (United States v. Angel Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Angel Alvarado, (5th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2020

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 12, 2020 No. 20-50083 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Angel Alvarez Alvarado,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-52-1

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Angel Alvarez Alvarado pleaded guilty, without the benefit of a plea agreement, to possession of a firearm after felony conviction and was sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment. He challenges the district court’s application of a sentencing enhancement, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B),

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2020

No. 20-50083

based on his possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. Here, the unrebutted presentence report stated that in addition to the firearm, Alvarado possessed 51 grams of cocaine, individually packaged for distribution, and that he admitted to selling cocaine for monetary compensation. The district court did not clearly err by applying the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement based on its plausible determination that Alvarado was engaged in drug trafficking. See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14(B)(ii)); United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146-48 (5th Cir. 2013). Alvarado’s unsupported speculation that he might have intended to consume rather than distribute all of the cocaine he possessed is unpersuasive and insufficient to demonstrate clear error. See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 146. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Guadalupe Alcantar
733 F.3d 143 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Angel Alvarado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-angel-alvarado-ca5-2020.