United States v. Andrews
439 F.2d 155
Opinion
The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.-
We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new trial or to let defendant have a second chance with a jury instead of a judge.
A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Andrews, 439 F.2d 155 (9th Cir. 1971).
439 F.2d 155 (United States v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. United States
365 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Odell Andrews v. United States of America, Willie Sloan v. United Statesof America
426 F.2d 1304 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)