United States v. Andrews
439 F.2d 155
This text of 439 F.2d 155 (United States v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Andrews, 439 F.2d 155 (9th Cir. 1971).
Opinion
The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.-
We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new trial or to let defendant have a second chance with a jury instead of a judge.
A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Campbell v. United States
365 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Odell Andrews v. United States of America, Willie Sloan v. United Statesof America
426 F.2d 1304 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
439 F.2d 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andrews-ca9-1971.