United States v. Andrews
This text of 528 F. App'x 384 (United States v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Covey Andrews appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to amend judgment, which asked the district court to modify a criminal judgment imposed three years ago. The district court properly recognized that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, although we grant Andrews leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm the challenged order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 F. App'x 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andrews-ca4-2013.