United States v. Andrews

528 F. App'x 384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6207
StatusPublished

This text of 528 F. App'x 384 (United States v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Andrews, 528 F. App'x 384 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Covey Andrews appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to amend judgment, which asked the district court to modify a criminal judgment imposed three years ago. The district court properly recognized that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, although we grant Andrews leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm the challenged order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 F. App'x 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andrews-ca4-2013.