United States v. Andrew Sokolow

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Andrew Sokolow

876 F.2d 786, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8391, 1989 WL 61362

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Andrew Sokolow. Read the opinion of the Court — 831 F.2d 1413 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 1989·No. 85-1021·Published

Opinion

In this case, with Judge Wiggins dissenting, the judgment of conviction of the defendant by the district court was reversed. United States v. Sokolow, 831 F.2d 1413 (9th Cir.1987).

On April 3, 1989, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. United States v. Sokolow, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989).

In accordance with that mandate, the defendant’s judgment of conviction by the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case, with Judge Wiggins dissenting, the judgment of conviction of the defendant by the district court was reversed. United States v. Sokolow, 831 F.2d 1413 (9th Cir.1987).

On April 3, 1989, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. United States v. Sokolow, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989).

In accordance with that mandate, the defendant’s judgment of conviction by the district court is

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Andrew Sokolow, 876 F.2d 786, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8391, 1989 WL 61362 (9th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

876 F.2d 786 (United States v. Andrew Sokolow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related