United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr.

460 F.2d 1407, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8968
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 443 F.2d 531
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 15, 1972·No. 825·Published

Opinion

460 F.2d 1407

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Andrew MUNCHAK, Jr., Appellant.

No. 825, Docket 72-1388.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued June 13, 1972.
Decided June 15, 1972.

Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The order denying appellant's motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y.1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr., 460 F.2d 1407, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8968 (2d Cir. 1972).

460 F.2d 1407 (United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Munchak
338 F. Supp. 1283 (S.D. New York, 1972)
United States v. Munchak
460 F.2d 1407 (Second Circuit, 1972)