United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr.
This text of 460 F.2d 1407 (United States v. Andrew Munchak, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Andrew MUNCHAK, Jr., Appellant.
No. 825, Docket 72-1388.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued June 13, 1972.
Decided June 15, 1972.
Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order denying appellant's motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 F.2d 1407, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andrew-munchak-jr-ca2-1972.