United States v. ANDREW HODGE

44 U.S. 534, 11 L. Ed. 714, 3 How. 534, 1845 U.S. LEXIS 442
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr'. Chief Justice TANEY

delivered the-opinion of the court on a motion to dismiss this case..'

This case is brought here by a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the eastern district-of Louisiana; and a motion has been made to dismiss it, because the citation was signed by the clerk, and not by a judge of the Circuit Court, or a justice of the- Supreme Court, as directed by the act of Congress ofd789, ch. 20, sect. 22.

. The defendant is not bound to appear, here, unless the citation is signed in the manner prescribed by law; and as that has not been done in this case, the. writ must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. ANDREW HODGE, 44 U.S. 534, 11 L. Ed. 714, 3 How. 534, 1845 U.S. LEXIS 442 (1845).

44 U.S. 534 (United States v. ANDREW HODGE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paulter v. Manuel
1909 OK 283 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Parks v. City of Ada
1909 OK 187 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)