United States v. Andrew A. Augustine

Third Circuit

United States v. Andrew A. Augustine

185 F.2d 407

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 6, 1951·No. 10203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the facts of the case at bar are clearly distinguishable from those of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404, 66 S.Ct. 546, 90 L.Ed. 752. There was evidence from which the jury was entitled to infer that the money received by the appellant was a dividend.

Such evidence was more than sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of conviction. Consequently it will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the facts of the case at bar are clearly distinguishable from those of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404, 66 S.Ct. 546, 90 L.Ed. 752. There was evidence from which the jury was entitled to infer that the money received by the appellant was a dividend.

Such evidence was more than sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of conviction. Consequently it will be affirmed.

United States v. Andrew A. Augustine, 185 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1951).

Pincite

185 F.2d 407 (United States v. Andrew A. Augustine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related