United States v. Andres-Manuel

686 F. App'x 664
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 20, 2017·No. No. 16-15388 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keith W. Upson, appointed counsel for Sebastian Andres-Manuel in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Andres-Manuel’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Andres-Manuel’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Andres-Manuel, 686 F. App'x 664 (11th Cir. 2017).

686 F. App'x 664 (United States v. Andres-Manuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)