United States v. Andre Evans

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 4, 2017·No. 16-2395·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________

No. 16-2395 ________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANDRE EVANS, Appellant ________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 2-15-cr-00423-001) District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III ________________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 27, 2017

Before: AMBRO, VANASKIE, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed May 2, 2017)

ORDER AMENDING NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Not Precedential Opinion in the above case filed May 2, 2017, be amended as follows:

On page 4, Footnote 1, add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph. “Evans has failed to raise, and thereby waived, any argument that § 3584(a) and § 5G1.3(d) apply to him because he is subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment under Pennsylvania law, under which the parole board has the authority to order him recommitted to prison.” By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: May 4, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Andre Evans, (3d Cir. 2017).

United States v. Andre Evans (United States v. Andre Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.