United States v. Andrade
This text of 101 F. App'x 249 (United States v. Andrade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jaime Jimmy Andrade appeals his 63-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent [250]*250to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Andrade contends that the district court erred by denying his request for a downward departure based on age, family ties, employment experience, and a combination of those factors. The government contends that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the claim. The government is correct. See United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 729 (9th Cir.1998) (stating this court lacks jurisdiction to review a district court’s denial of a discretionary downward departure where it recognizes it has the authority to depart and declines to do so).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F. App'x 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andrade-ca9-2004.