United States v. Anderson
Opinion
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
James L. ANDERSON Aviation Maintenance Administrationman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900023
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 16 October 2018 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authori- ty: reduction to E-1, confinement for 6 months, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge. For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________
1The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 120 days pursuant to a pretrial agreement. United States v. Anderson, No. 201900023
Before HUTCHINSON, TANG, and GERDING, Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor- rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.