United States v. Anderson
This text of 19 C.M.A. 8 (United States v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
A special court-martial convicted the accused of three specifications of unauthorized absence and one specification alleging breach of restriction. The accused had a history of similar offenses in his current enlistment; all of them stemmed from marital difficulties and excessive drinking. The court-martial imposed a sentence which included a bad-conduct discharge, notwithstanding the accused had over ten years of Naval service and testified: “It’s the only thing I’ve done all my life — been at sea.”
From the staff legal officer’s post-trial review, it appears that during the accused’s current enlistment he had served in Vietnam and had been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. This information was not presented to the court-martial. Had the court-martial known of it, a bad-conduct discharge might not have been approved. United States v Rowe, 18 USCMA 54, 39 CMR 54; United States v Pointer, 18 USCMA 587, 40 CMR 299.
The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is reversed. A rehearing thereof may be ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 C.M.A. 8, 19 USCMA 8, 41 C.M.R. 8, 1969 CMA LEXIS 684, 1969 WL 6259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anderson-cma-1969.