United States v. Anderson

54 F. App'x 483
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 17, 2003·No. No. 01-50230; D.C. No. CR-99-00518-WDK·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM**

Larry Darnel Anderson appeals his 155-month sentence, imposed following our limited remand in his prior appeal, No. 00-50094, for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d), and brandishing a firearm in conjunction with a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Anderson’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Anderson has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders and pro se briefs, and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, 54 F. App'x 483 (9th Cir. 2003).

54 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)