United States v. Anderson
This text of 121 F. App'x 680 (United States v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Walter Lee Anderson appeals the revocation of his federal supervised release and subsequent resentencing by the District Court1 after testing positive for cocaine. Anderson’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), identifying six issues that “might arguably support” Anderson’s appeal. Id. at 744.
Having conducted an independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. We therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anderson-ca8-2005.