United States v. Anderson

121 F. App'x 680
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2005·No. No. 03-3915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Walter Lee Anderson appeals the revocation of his federal supervised release and subsequent resentencing by the District Court1 after testing positive for cocaine. Anderson’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), identifying six issues that “might arguably support” Anderson’s appeal. Id. at 744.

Having conducted an independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. We therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, 121 F. App'x 680 (8th Cir. 2005).

121 F. App'x 680 (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)