United States v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 F.3d 795
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 1996·No. 96-20049·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20049 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH ALVIN ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-90-108-S - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Alvin Anderson, #52456-079, appeals from the district

court’s order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct

his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues his

criminal prosecution following the administrative forfeiture of

his gun collection of 111 guns violated the Fifth Amendment

prohibition against double jeopardy. We have reviewed the record

and the briefs of the parties and perceive no reversible error.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No.96-20049 - 2 -

Jeopardy did not attach because Anderson was not a party to the

administrative forfeiture. See United States v. Arreola-Ramos,

60 F.3d 188, 192 (5th Cir. 1995). We affirm on the basis of the

reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Arreola-Ramos
60 F.3d 188 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)