United States v. Anderson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20049 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH ALVIN ANDERSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-90-108-S - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joseph Alvin Anderson, #52456-079, appeals from the district
court’s order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct
his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues his
criminal prosecution following the administrative forfeiture of
his gun collection of 111 guns violated the Fifth Amendment
prohibition against double jeopardy. We have reviewed the record
and the briefs of the parties and perceive no reversible error.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No.96-20049 - 2 -
Jeopardy did not attach because Anderson was not a party to the
administrative forfeiture. See United States v. Arreola-Ramos,
60 F.3d 188, 192 (5th Cir. 1995). We affirm on the basis of the
reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.