United States v. Anderson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-10253 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MERVIN GLEN ANDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-2803-H - - - - - - - - - - September 10, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mervin Anderson, federal prisoner # 12497-076, moves this
court for in forma pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district
court’s judgment dismissing his motion brought pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2255 as successive under Rule 9(b) of the Rules
Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Anderson argues only the
merits of the issues he raised in his § 2255 motion in the
district court. Because Anderson provides no argument on the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10253 - 2 -
only appealable issue, the propriety of the district court’s
dismissal of his motion under Rule 9(b), he has not established a
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. His motion to proceed IFP is
DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Anderson that any
additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will
invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Anderson
is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that
they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.