United States v. Anacleto P. Gutierrez

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Anacleto P. Gutierrez

432 F.2d 562

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 1970

Docket25654_1

StatusPublished

This text of 432 F.2d 562 (United States v. Anacleto P. Gutierrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Anacleto P. Gutierrez, 432 F.2d 562 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment convicting Anacleto P. Gutierrez of smuggling and conspiring to smuggle marihuana into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, is affirmed.

The evidence is sufficient to support the finding of Gutierrez’ guilt on both counts; none of the assigned procedural errors has merit, and the record reveals no unusual circumstances sufficient to show that the trial judge in fixing the statutorily permissible sentence abused his discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment convicting Anacleto P. Gutierrez of smuggling and conspiring to smuggle marihuana into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, is affirmed.

The evidence is sufficient to support the finding of Gutierrez’ guilt on both counts; none of the assigned procedural errors has merit, and the record reveals no unusual circumstances sufficient to show that the trial judge in fixing the statutorily permissible sentence abused his discretion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 F.2d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anacleto-p-gutierrez-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack