United States v. Amir Khayyat

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 2026
Docket25-6575
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Amir Khayyat (United States v. Amir Khayyat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Amir Khayyat, (4th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6575 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AMIR SALVATORE KHAYYAT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:20-cr-00371-KDB-DCK-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2025 Decided: January 29, 2026

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amir Salvatore Khayyat, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6575 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Amir Salvatore Khayyat seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e) motion for early termination of supervised release. During the pendency

of this appeal, however, Khayyat completed his term of supervised release. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Fleet Feet, Inc. v. NIKE, 986 F.3d 458, 463 (4th Cir.

2021) (“If an event occurs during the pendency of an appeal that makes it impossible for a

court to grant effective relief to a prevailing party, then the appeal must be dismissed as

moot.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We deny his motion to seal his informal brief.

See generally Gonzalez v. Cuccinelli, 985 F.3d 357, 376-77 (4th Cir. 2021). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, II
985 F.3d 357 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
Fleet Feet, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.
986 F.3d 458 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Amir Khayyat, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-amir-khayyat-ca4-2026.