United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

45 F.R.D. 477, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12766
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1968·No. Crim. No. 66-295·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

The defendants’ motion to enjoin the attorneys for the United States from disclosing grand jury material, filed November 5, 1968, is hereby denied, since:

(1) Rule 6(e) expressly provides that attorneys for the United States may use grand jury material in the performance of their duties.

(2) Interviewing prospective Government witnesses and reviewing their testimony with them is an appropriate part of the duties of an attorney for the United States.

(3) Allowing a prospective Government witness to review his own testimony before the grand jury does not endanger grand jury secrecy and thus is not an improper “disclosure” within the meaning of Rule 6(e).

(4) The facts alleged do not indicate that any Government attorney has behaved improperly or breached grand jury secrecy.

For all the above reasons the motion is deficient as a matter of fact and law and must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 45 F.R.D. 477, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12766 (W.D. Pa. 1968).

45 F.R.D. 477 (United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re SEALED MOTION
880 F.2d 1367 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Bazzano
570 F.2d 1120 (Third Circuit, 1977)
United States v. John Bazzano
570 F.2d 1120 (Third Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Heinze
361 F. Supp. 46 (D. Delaware, 1973)
King v. Jones
319 F. Supp. 653 (N.D. Ohio, 1970)