United States v. America Online, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

United States v. America Online, Inc.

61 F. App'x 895

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2003·No. No. 03-1117·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lindsay Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to quash a John Doe summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and denying her motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Does, No. CA-02-42-MC (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 20, 2002; entered Dec. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lindsay Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to quash a John Doe summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and denying her motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Does, No. CA-02-42-MC (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 20, 2002; entered Dec. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. America Online, Inc., 61 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

61 F. App'x 895 (United States v. America Online, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.