United States v. America Online, Inc.

61 F. App'x 895
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 2003
DocketNo. 03-1117
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. App'x 895 (United States v. America Online, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. America Online, Inc., 61 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lindsay Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to quash a John Doe summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and denying her motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Does, No. CA-02-42-MC (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 20, 2002; entered Dec. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F. App'x 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-america-online-inc-ca4-2003.