United States v. Ambrose
71 M.J. 185, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 269
This text of 71 M.J. 185 (United States v. Ambrose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Ambrose, 71 M.J. 185, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 269 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 20100042. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF THE ADDITIONAL CHARGE FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXPRESSLY ALLEGE OR NECESSARILY IMPLY THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 185, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ambrose-armfor-2012.