United States v. Amaya
This text of 74 M.J. 264 (United States v. Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 20120406. On consideration of the granted issue, and the judgment of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. Amaya, No. 20120406 (A. Ct. Crim. App. Feb. 24, 2014), we conclude that the military judge granted Appellant the relief to which he was entitled by reducing the maximum punishment for disobeying an order not to travel outside the limits of Fort Richardson, under Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892 (2008), to that authorized for breaking restriction under Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2008). See Manual for Courts Martial,- United States pt. IV, ¶ 16.e. Note (2008 ed.). Therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the United States Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 M.J. 264, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-amaya-armfor-2015.