United States v. Amador
This text of 24 F. Cas. 779 (United States v. Amador) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The board of commissioners have confirmed this claim without suggesting any doubt as to its entire validity. The genuineness of the grant is not disputed, and it appears to have been approved by the departmental assembly. The conditions have been fully complied with, and the premises granted have been the family residence of the grantee from a period prior to the issuing of the grant, and he has continued to cultivate and improve his land down to the present time. A part of his land has been conveyed by him to other parties, and he now asks for a confirmation of his claim to the remainder. A decree to that effect was made by the board of commissioners. A decree must therefore be entered in this court affirming the decision of the board and confirming the claimant’s title to the extent solicited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. Cas. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-amador-cand-1855.