United States v. Alvin J. Johnson
This text of United States v. Alvin J. Johnson (United States v. Alvin J. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-2480EA _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Alvin J. Johnson, also known as Albert * [UNPUBLISHED] Johnson, * * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: September 16, 1997 Filed: September 19, 1997 _____________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Alvin J. Johnson appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. On appeal, Johnson renews the challenge he made in the district court, namely, the 100-to-1 sentencing ratio for crack versus powder cocaine violates Johnson's equal protection and due process rights. Johnson's challenge, however, is foreclosed by our decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio. See, e.g., United States v. Carter, 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v. Jackson, 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1684 (1996); see also United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1220 (8th Cir. 1995) (rejecting challenge based on rule of lenity), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 966 (1996).
Accoridngly, we affirm Johnson's sentence.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Alvin J. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alvin-j-johnson-ca8-1997.