United States v. Alvin J. Johnson, Also Known as Albert Johnson

124 F.3d 209, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30974
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 1997
Docket97-2480
StatusUnpublished

This text of 124 F.3d 209 (United States v. Alvin J. Johnson, Also Known as Albert Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alvin J. Johnson, Also Known as Albert Johnson, 124 F.3d 209, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30974 (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

124 F.3d 209

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Alvin J. JOHNSON, also known as Albert Johnson, Appellant.

No. 97-2480EA.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 19, 1997.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 1997.
Filed: Sept. 19, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Alvin J. Johnson appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. On appeal, Johnson renews the challenge he made in the district court, namely, the 100-to-1 sentencing ratio for crack versus powder cocaine violates Johnson's equal protection and due process rights. Johnson's challenge, however, is foreclosed by our decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio. See, e.g., United States v. Carter, 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam); United States v. Jackson, 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1684 (1996); see also United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1220 (8th Cir.1995) (rejecting challenge based on rule of lenity), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 966 (1996).

Accordingly, we affirm Johnson's sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 F.3d 209, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alvin-j-johnson-also-known-as-albe-ca8-1997.