United States v. Alvin Harrison Peterson

435 F.2d 1313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 1971
Docket25909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 F.2d 1313 (United States v. Alvin Harrison Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alvin Harrison Peterson, 435 F.2d 1313 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The “concurrent sentences” rule first announced in Sinclair v. United States, 279 U.S. 263, 299, 49 S.Ct. 268, 73 L.Ed. 692 (1929) and consistently adhered to *1314 by the Supreme Court (Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 359, 78 S.Ct. 311, 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958), Greene v. United States, 358 U.S. 326, 330, 79 S.Ct. 340, 3 L.Ed.2d 340 (1959)) makes unnecessary any examination into appellant’s sole assignment of error which attacks the validity of one of several convictions under a multi-count indictment.

We have nevertheless considered the assignment; granted the criticized instruction should not have been given, the conclusion is manifest that the error was harmless. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Terry Joseph Wing
450 F.2d 806 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Warren Russell Newton
442 F.2d 622 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F.2d 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alvin-harrison-peterson-ca9-1971.