United States v. Alvin C. Moyer and Jacob E. Moyer D/B/A Moyer Brothers, Alvin C. Moyer

420 F.2d 375, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 70
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 9, 1970·No. 17922·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The District Court held that the Government’s action to reduce to judgment certain taxes, penalties and interest was not barred by the statute of limitations because the running of the limitations period was suspended by the appellant taxpayer’s submission of an offer in compromise for the period during which the offer was pending and for one year thereafter. This appeal followed.

On review of the record we find no error for the reasons so well stated in the Memorandum Opinion of Judge Sorg.

The Order of the District Court entering judgment in favor of the Government will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alvin C. Moyer and Jacob E. Moyer D/B/A Moyer Brothers, Alvin C. Moyer, 420 F.2d 375, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 70 (3d Cir. 1970).

420 F.2d 375 (United States v. Alvin C. Moyer and Jacob E. Moyer D/B/A Moyer Brothers, Alvin C. Moyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington University
132 F.3d 77 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
Omholt v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 60 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Estate of Elliott v. Commissioner
57 T.C. 152 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Formico v. Commissioner
1971 T.C. Memo. 171 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
United States v. Carlow
323 F. Supp. 1310 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
Estate of Dorn v. Commissioner
54 T.C. 1651 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)