United States v. Alvarez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alvarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 F.4th 339
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2023·No. 22-10209·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10209 Document: 00516731447 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10209 Summary Calendar FILED April 28, 2023 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jacob Alvarez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:21-CR-43-1 ______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jacob Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alvarez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10209 Document: 00516731447 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2023

No. 22-10209

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alvarez, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Alvarez (United States v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)