United States v. Alvarez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alvarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 F.3d 309
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1999·No. 99-20203·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20203 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIRO ALVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-210-2 --------------------

December 16, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Jairo Alvarez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Alvarez has filed a response

requesting to proceed pro se. Our independent review of the

brief, the record, and Alvarez’ response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-20203 -2-

Alvarez’ motion to proceed pro se is DENIED. See United States

v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alvarez, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Alvarez (United States v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)