United States v. Altieri

44 Cust. Ct. 652
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 12, 1960
DocketReap. Dec. 9662; Entry No. 3295
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 652 (United States v. Altieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Altieri, 44 Cust. Ct. 652 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The above appeal for reappraisement was filed by-the collector of customs at San Juan, P.R., against the appraisement. [653]*653by the United States appraiser of merchandise at that port, pursuant to section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, of certain canvas basketball and tennis shoes with rubber soles.

When this matter was called for a hearing, a letter from the importer of record was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, in which the parties agreed as to the following values:

Ref. Sizes Pairs in sizes Appraised value per pair
113 4/9 180 $2.25
10/13 120 2. 35
1/2 60 2.50
111 4/9 180 2.55
.10/13 120 2.65
1/2 60 2.80 .
207 4/10 644 2.25
11/3 552 2.45
220D ' 4/10 140 2.25
11/3 120 2.45
All less 2%, packed

In view of the Presidential proclamation, dated February 1, 1933, reported in 63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D. 46158, and the foregoing stipulation of facts, I find that the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1402(g)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise and that said values are as agreed to and set forth above.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1402
19 U.S.C. § 1402(g)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-altieri-cusc-1960.