United States v. Altamirano-Lopez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 1998
Docket97-50763
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Altamirano-Lopez (United States v. Altamirano-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Altamirano-Lopez, (5th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-50763 _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO ALTAMIRANO-LOPEZ, also known as Ernesto Ochoa-Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (EP-96-CR-49-ALL) _______________________________________________________

August 31, 1998

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court’s sentence of 70 months is affirmed. The

order of this court on the prior appeal “for resentencing

consistent herewith” (114 F.3d 48, 50) did not restrict the

district court to a sentence without the enhancement. It was to

resolve the uncertainty of the state judgment. When this court

remands for resentencing, without expressly limiting the district

court, it is expected that the court will determine the proper

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. sentence, hearing additional evidence if necessary. See United

States v. Marmolejo, 139 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 1998) and United

States v. Kinder, 980 F.2d 961 (5th cir. 1992).

The district court’s order incorrectly assessed $100 instead

of $50 for the special assessment, a clerical error or

inadvertent oversight. The cause is remanded for modification

and correction.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. CAUSE REMANDED FOR

CORRECTION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Herrera-Solorzano
114 F.3d 48 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Marmolejo
139 F.3d 528 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. David Kinder and Larry Kinder
980 F.2d 961 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Altamirano-Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-altamirano-lopez-ca5-1998.