United States v. Alston
This text of 606 F. App'x 110 (United States v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Wayne Alston appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 24 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Alston argues that there was insufficient evidence before the district court to establish that he violated the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence of Alston’s violation was more than sufficient to support the district court’s revocation decision. See 18 U.S.C. § 8583(e)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 F. App'x 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alston-ca4-2015.