United States v. Alston

696 F. App'x 479
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2017
DocketNo. 16-17418 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 696 F. App'x 479 (United States v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alston, 696 F. App'x 479 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen A. Mosca, appointed counsel for Andre Alston in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of mérit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Alston’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alston v. United States
M.D. Florida, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alston-ca11-2017.