United States v. Alonso-Martinez
This text of United States v. Alonso-Martinez (United States v. Alonso-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40177 Conference Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN ALONSO-MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-94-CR-209-1 - - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Juan Alonso-Martinez has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744,
(1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record,
and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Alonso-Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alonso-martinez-ca5-1995.